¾«¶«Ó°Òµ

Researching on tablet

Research Library

All reports in ¾«¶«Ó°Òµâ€™s Research Library are available upon request. Executive summaries are available below for the latest LSAT Technical Reports and other research published within the last 10 years.

Looking for older reports? Consult the Research Archive

Current Research:

This report provides insight into how students with disabilities in the 2024-2025 1L class navigated the law school application process.
Based on survey responses from 2023 law school matriculants, this report provides nuanced information about factors that affect law school decision-making processes for students with disabilities.
This report focuses on the 2023 1L class, examining who is enrolling in law school, where they enrolled, and how they made their enrollment decision.
An in-depth look at how law schools are supporting LGBTQ+ individuals through their legal education journey.
Based on survey responses from 2022 law school matriculants, this report provides nuanced information about factors that affect law school decision-making processes for students with disabilities.
The ¾«¶«Ó°Òµ Research team has issued a first-of-its-kind report offering a highly nuanced perspective on how law schools support LGBTQ+ students.
By Elizabeth Bodamer and Debra Langer
Data shows that justice-impacted individuals face a particularly difficult path to legal education. Is it time to talk about reform?

Item response theory (IRT) is a mathematical model used to support the development, analysis, and scoring of tests and questionnaires. For example, IRT allows for the description of item (i.e., question) characteristics, such as difficulty, as well as the proficiency level of test takers. Various IRT models are available, and choosing the most appropriate model for a particular test is essential. Since the fit of the test data to the chosen model is never perfect, measuring the fit of the model to the data is imperative.

Item response theory (IRT) is a mathematical model that is often applied in the development and analysis of educational and psychological assessments. Various IRT models exist, and practitioners must choose the model that is most appropriate for their particular assessment. Even when the most appropriate model is applied, the fit of the assessment data to the model is rarely perfect in practice. How serious, then, is model misfit for practical decision-making?